Nlc accuses scullion of breaking election promise on land rights
(15) After he became PM at th울산안마e beginning of 2000 he was asked to resign from the ministry and from cabinet in December 2000 on the ground that he broke a commitment he had made in 1997 that he would not extend a land reform package. There was already a huge movement of workers in the public sector against the cabinet ministers who were taking the land reform packages and the land reform programme was in jeopardy of dying because of this. At the same time, there was also a growing demand for a real land reform package that would give more priority to rural development. In August 2001 he had appointed L. N. Khera as the minister of environment and forest, who had expressed the view that rural development was not a priority for him. That was a very unpopular position among workers, because Khera was already making concessions in this area. The Congress government did not agree with Khera at all and the land reform package was very much opposed by them. (16)
The land reform package had some elemen개츠비 카지노ts that had been tried by some parties before. In September 2001, for example, in a report in the daily Hindu카지노 사이트, J.K. Gandhi had criticised the government for providing compensation for loss of farm land of the agricultural cooperatives. On that occasion the government had not done a real land reform package. (17)
The land reform package gave a new meaning to this phrase: land reform was about ‘land reform’ in a rather new sense. The term ‘land reform’ was used for about ten years before in the sense of the development of land management and conservation. It was first used in a legal sense. The land was used for farming, for agricultural products in India, and then for making cars and so on. But it is in the context of a real policy reform of which the idea of’real reform’ was introduced by the Gandhis after they became prime ministers and their experience led them to call for reform in the sense of real and urgent land reforms. In the light of this context it is useful to look at this in more detail because I do not want to give any interpretation into what kind of’real’ land reform the Gandhis were advocating. I am referring to real land reform since that is where the actual land reform was supposed to be implemented. It was their political project and if they wanted it in the future it would be a part of it. They wanted to go from there to real land reform so that it could come into force.
But I would not conside